OmO
Oh My OpenAgentv4.7.5

review-work

Post-implementation review orchestrator. Spawns 5 parallel background sub-agents and demands all pass.

review-work runs the work back through five lenses in parallel, then aggregates. Every lane must pass for the overall review to pass — it's a quality gate, not a vibe check.

Triggers

"review work", "review my work", "QA my work".

The five lanes

LaneAsks
Goal verificationDoes the result actually match the request?
Code qualityIs the code maintainable, idiomatic, and free of slop?
SecurityAre there vulnerability classes the change introduces?
Hands-on QADoes it work end-to-end when actually run?
Context miningWhat did the agents miss that the codebase already encodes?

Five background sub-agents fire in parallel — same shape as ultrawork. The aggregator collects pass/fail per lane and decides the overall verdict.

When to invoke

After an ultrawork session, after a long Atlas execution, after any change you're about to commit but want a second pass on. Drop the trigger phrase and the skill takes over.

Source Notes

Aligned with upstream docs/reference/features.md#built-in-skills.

On this page